Key result
Improved accuracy in coronary heart disease risk assessment necessitates a reevaluation of the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Why the study?
How does more accurate risk assessment of coronary heart disease affect the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies?
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Refined CHD risk assessment may warrant reevaluating prevention strategies; leaves open impact on outcomes.
The way we assess risk of coronary heart disease has become more accurate in recent years. How does this affect the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies?
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manuel et al. (2006) studied this question. Improved accuracy in coronary heart disease risk assessment necessitates a reevaluation of the efficacy of primary and secondary prevention strategies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: