Planning secondary prevention: Room for improvement
Key result
Secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes requires a shift towards multidisciplinary, patient-centered models to address suboptimal prognosis and high treatment costs.
Population
Patients after acute coronary syndromes
Design
Review
Authors
Discussion
Loading...
Member takes
Implication
May support multidisciplinary ACS secondary prevention models; leaves open prospective trials on outcomes and costs.
Structured PICO
P
Population
Patients after acute coronary syndromes
I
Intervention
Secondary prevention strategies including pharmacological (antithrombotic, lipid-lowering) and non-pharmacological (multidisciplinary teams, cardiac rehabilitation) approaches
This review emphasizes the need to integrate innovative pharmacological therapies with patient-centered, multidisciplinary approaches to optimize secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes.
Cite This Study
Cortés-Beringola et al. (2017) conducted a review in Acute coronary syndromes. Secondary prevention strategies was evaluated. Secondary prevention after acute coronary syndromes requires a shift towards multidisciplinary, patient-centered models to address suboptimal prognosis and high treatment costs.