Second-generation cryoballoon ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of chronic pulmonary vein isolation compared with first-generation cryoballoon (77% vs. 32%; P < 0.0001).
Observational (n=206)
Absolute Event Rate: 77% vs 32%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
AIMS: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the first-generation cryoballoon (CB1) was characterized by a high rate of recovered pulmonary vein (PV) conduction along with a typical conduction gap pattern in patients with recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa). Second generation (CB2) enables more uniform freezing. However, the rate of chronic PVI and PV conduction gap pattern is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients with ATa recurrence undergoing a second procedure after CB2 or (historical) CB1 PVI (28 mm) were enrolled. In all patients, a left atrial three-dimensional electronatomic reconstruction was performed. The rates of chronic PVI and localization of PV conduction gaps were determined and compared between CB1 and CB2. Antral PV re-isolation was performed using irrigated-tip radiofrequency current energy ablation. Of 206 patients (CB2), 18 patients underwent the repeat procedure after 192 (75:245) days. In 6 of 18 (33%) patients, all PVs were electrically isolated whereas in the remaining 12 patients (66%) at least one PV demonstrated PV reconduction. Of 71 PVs 1 left common PV (LCPV), 55 PVs (77%) were chronically isolated. The right superior PV (RSPV) was characterized by the lowest rate of chronic PVI (RSPV: 56%, LSPV: 76%, RIPV: 83%, LIPV: 94%, LCPV: 100%). Compared with CB1, CB2 ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of chronic PVI (CB2: 77% vs. CB1: 32%; P < 0.0001) with the greatest improvement along both inferior PVs. CONCLUSION: Second-generation cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with a high rate of durable PVI in patients with ATa recurrence. The RSPV represents the PV with the greatest risk for left atrium-pulmonary vein reconnection.
Bordignon et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia (n=206). Second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation vs. First-generation cryoballoon (CB1) ablation was evaluated on Chronic pulmonary vein isolation rate (p=< 0.0001). Second-generation cryoballoon ablation resulted in a significantly higher rate of chronic pulmonary vein isolation compared with first-generation cryoballoon (77% vs. 32%; P < 0.0001).