Hazy viewpoints: administrators' perceptions of hazing

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine the perceptions regarding hazing from the perspective of the current National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 (D1) Student Athletes (SAs), Athletic Directors (ADs) and Senior Women Administrators (SWAs). Design/Methodology/Approach: This was a non-experimental mixed-method electronic survey. Findings: The perceptions regarding hazing from the three participant groups indicate that differences exist in how hazing is perceived both within and outside the institution. These differences may decrease the overall effectiveness of a hazing policy, unless a clear succinct hazing definition is created. Practical implications: Both the NCAA and its member institutions need to send a clear antihazing message by establishing written antihazing policies that include a clear definition of hazing. Educational programmes, which provide information on hazing, the possible consequences and the recognition of perceptual differences, should be implemented for administrators and athletes. Originality/Value: By identifying both the extent and perceived severity of hazing in women's collegiate athletics and establishing the present perceptions regarding hazing, this study may provide valuable information that may help create guidelines on hazing, as well as attempt to reduce the risk of injury.