Electrocardiography and echocardiography demonstrated similar diagnostic values for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with excellent specificity (97% and 100%) but lower sensitivity (61% and 62%).
Cross-Sectional (n=155)
BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of ECG and echocardiography for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) has not been reassessed since the development of molecular genetics. The aim of the study was to evaluate it in adults, with the genetic status used as the criterion of reference. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten families with previously identified mutations were studied (9 mutations in 3 genes). ECG and echocardiography were analyzed in 155 adults, of whom 77 were genetically affected and 78 unaffected. The major diagnostic criteria were, for echocardiography, a left ventricular wall thickness > 13 mm and, for ECG, abnormal Q waves, left ventricular hypertrophy, and marked ST-T changes. Minor ECG and echographic abnormalities were also analyzed. (1) Sensitivity and specificity of major criteria were 61% and 97% for ECG and 62% and 100% for echocardiography. (2) Sensitivity but not specificity was age related (from 50% at 50 years old, P 30 years of age. (4) Healthy carriers without any ECG or echocardiographic abnormality represented 17% of genetically affected adults. CONCLUSIONS: ECG and echocardiography have similar diagnostic values for FHC in adults, with an excellent specificity and a lower sensitivity. The association of the two techniques allows a better evaluation of the risk of being genetically affected in families with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Charron et al. (Tue,) conducted a cross-sectional in Familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (FHC) (n=155). Electrocardiography (ECG) and Echocardiography vs. Genetic status (reference criterion) was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of major diagnostic criteria for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Electrocardiography and echocardiography demonstrated similar diagnostic values for familial hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, with excellent specificity (97% and 100%) but lower sensitivity (61% and 62%).