Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This article examines the problem of estimating interrater agreement about the job relevance of test items by examining 4 different indexes: C. H. Lawshe's (1975) Content Validity Index (CVI); H. E. A. Tinsley and D. J. Weiss's (1975) T; L. R. James, R. G. Demaree, and G. Wolf's (1984) r WG(J) : and M. K. Lindell, C. J. Brandt, and D. J. Whitney's (1999) r WG(J) * . These 4 indexes are shown to be systematically related to each other, but r WG(J) * is computationally simpler and is more generally applicable than the other indexes.
Lindell et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: