CYP2C9 variants (*1/*3, *2/*3, or *3/*3) were significantly more frequent among highly unstable oral anticoagulation cases than stable controls (29.9% vs 15.0%; P=0.042).
Case-Control (n=157)
Yes
Oral anticoagulation instability (n=157)
Risk factors (working status, acenocoumarol, poor comprehension, CYP2C9 variants) vs Stable controls
International Normalized Ratio (INR) above 4.5, p=<0.0001
Absolute Event Rate: 12.3% vs 0.4%
p-value: p=<0.0001
The factors associated with persistent instability of oral anticoagulant treatment (OAT) were investigated in a case-control study. The most unstable patients from 35 Italian anticoagulation clinics were matched with stable controls, for gender, age and OAT indication. Socio-demographic data, medical history, dietary and life habits, cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants, blood cell count, liver and renal functions were investigated. An 'Abbreviated Mental Test' (AMT) and a questionnaire to assess patient compliance to, and comprehension of, OAT indications and mechanisms were administered. An International Normalized Ratio (INR) above 4.5 was more frequently found in cases (n = 77) than controls (n = 80) (12.3% vs. 0.4%; P < 0.0001). The odds ratio for instability was significantly higher for: people who worked versus pensioners, acenocoumarol versus warfarin, and an insufficient score in the AMT and/or in the questionnaire. Cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 variants *1/*3 or *2/*3 or *3/*3 were more frequent among cases than controls (29.9% vs.15.0%; P = 0.042). No differences were observed as regards the other variables. In conclusion, we found that high intra-individual variability in OAT control was multifactorial, but poor OAT comprehension was prevalent.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gualtiero Palareti
Vascular Medicine
Cristina Legnani
Goethe University Frankfurt
Giuliana Guazzaloca
University of Padua
British Journal of Haematology
University of Padua
University of Bologna
University of Florence
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Palareti et al. (Mon,) conducted a case-control in Oral anticoagulation instability (n=157). Risk factors (working status, acenocoumarol, poor comprehension, CYP2C9 variants) vs. Stable controls was evaluated on International Normalized Ratio (INR) above 4.5 (p=<0.0001). CYP2C9 variants (*1/*3, *2/*3, or *3/*3) were significantly more frequent among highly unstable oral anticoagulation cases than stable controls (29.9% vs 15.0%; P=0.042).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a1c04cfc97d63156a5f38a6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05417.x