Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The author offers a counter argument for the use of the term pseudopolymorphism. He argues that the term polymorph should ideally be restricted to crystals of a single compound. However, he notes that in multicomponent crystals there are too many structural variations and the term polymorphism is unnecessarily restrictive. The term pseudopolymorphism in this context brings to attention the fact that certain related multicomponent crystals, with slightly different chemical compositions or stoichiometries, have slightly different crystal structures in a manner reminiscent of polymorphism.
Gautam R. Desiraju (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: