Biological risk markers for cardiovascular disease were worse in 35-year-old subjects compared with 30-year-olds, and worse in men than women, indicating risk increases early in adult life.
Observational (n=12,982)
Yes
Cardiovascular risk (n=12,982)
Live for Life health promotion programme
Differences in cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors and biological risk markers
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study differences in cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors and biological risk markers in early adult life, with special attention to age and sex differences. Lifestyle cardiovascular risk factors included dietary habits, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol habits, psychosocial strain, and mental stress. Biological risk markers included anthropometric variables, arterial blood pressure, and serum cholesterol concentration. DESIGN: A combined individual and community based preventive programme, including health examinations. SETTING: All communities in the County of Skaraborg in south western Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 12,982 men and women aged 30 or 35 years who underwent health examinations over seven years. MAIN RESULTS: In both sexes, biological risk markers studied were worse in 35 year old subjects than in 30 year olds. Furthermore, a larger proportion of men aged 35 years were smokers and were physically inactive compared with 30 year old men. However, dietary habits were better in both sexes in the upper age group. At both ages there were also significant differences between men and women. Women, compared with men, had better dietary habits and lower alcohol consumption but smoked more and experienced greater mental stress and psychosocial strain. All biological risk markers were worse in men than in women at both ages studied. During the observation period, some improvement of the health profile of the participants was observed, indicating a beneficial effect of the intervention programme. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the risk of cardiovascular disease, as assessed from studying lifestyle and biological risk markers, increases early in life, suggesting that preventive measures should start early.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Lars‐Göran Persson
Statens Serum Institut
K. Lindström
Duke University
Hans Lingfors
Linköping University
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health
Swedish e-Science Research Centre
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Persson et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Cardiovascular risk (n=12,982). Live for Life health promotion programme was evaluated on Differences in cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors and biological risk markers. Biological risk markers for cardiovascular disease were worse in 35-year-old subjects compared with 30-year-olds, and worse in men than women, indicating risk increases early in adult life.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0934a3b7dd28a06e160dd5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.52.7.425