Key result
Biological risk markers for cardiovascular disease were worse in 35-year-old subjects compared with 30-year-olds, and worse in men than women, indicating risk increases early in adult life.
Why the study?
Do cardiovascular lifestyle and biological risk markers differ by age and sex among adults aged 30 and 35 years, and does a preventive programme improve them?
Observational (n=12,982)
Yes
Do cardiovascular lifestyle and biological risk markers differ by age and sex among adults aged 30 and 35 years, and does a preventive programme improve them?
Cardiovascular risk markers worsen between ages 30 and 35, particularly in men, suggesting that preventive measures should start early in adult life.
Supports earlier risk monitoring in young adults; leaves open whether preventive programs alter trajectories in this age group.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study differences in cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors and biological risk markers in early adult life, with special attention to age and sex differences. Lifestyle cardiovascular risk factors included dietary habits, physical inactivity, smoking, alcohol habits, psychosocial strain, and mental stress. Biological risk markers included anthropometric variables, arterial blood pressure, and serum cholesterol concentration. DESIGN: A combined individual and community based preventive programme, including health examinations. SETTING: All communities in the County of Skaraborg in south western Sweden. PARTICIPANTS: Altogether 12,982 men and women aged 30 or 35 years who underwent health examinations over seven years. MAIN RESULTS: In both sexes, biological risk markers studied were worse in 35 year old subjects than in 30 year olds. Furthermore, a larger proportion of men aged 35 years were smokers and were physically inactive compared with 30 year old men. However, dietary habits were better in both sexes in the upper age group. At both ages there were also significant differences between men and women. Women, compared with men, had better dietary habits and lower alcohol consumption but smoked more and experienced greater mental stress and psychosocial strain. All biological risk markers were worse in men than in women at both ages studied. During the observation period, some improvement of the health profile of the participants was observed, indicating a beneficial effect of the intervention programme. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that the risk of cardiovascular disease, as assessed from studying lifestyle and biological risk markers, increases early in life, suggesting that preventive measures should start early.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Persson et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular risk (n=12,982). Live for Life health promotion programme was evaluated on Differences in cardiovascular lifestyle risk factors and biological risk markers. Biological risk markers for cardiovascular disease were worse in 35-year-old subjects compared with 30-year-olds, and worse in men than women, indicating risk increases early in adult life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: