March 27, 1967
View Full PaperBlood Pressure Measurement in Shock
Structured PICO
Does direct arterial pressure measurement improve the accuracy of blood pressure assessment compared to indirect cuff measurement in patients with shock?
P
Population
18 patients with shock and high total peripheral vascular resistance, 21 hypotensive patients with low or normal resistance, and an unspecified number of normal subjects
I
Intervention
Direct arterial pressure measurement
C
Comparator
Indirect cuff pressure measurement by auscultation or palpation of the brachial artery
O
Outcome
Discrepancy between direct arterial pressure and indirect cuff pressuresurrogate
Indirect cuff blood pressure measurement significantly underestimates true arterial pressure in shock patients with high peripheral vascular resistance, highlighting the need for direct arterial monitoring in this population.
Abstract
Arterial pressure was considerably higher than the cuff pressure obtained by auscultation or palpation of the brachial artery in 18 patients with shock and high total peripheral vascular resistance. Pulse pressure was also greatly underestimated by indirect measurement. This discrepancy was not observed in 21 hypotensive patients with low or normal resistance. Infusion of vasoconstrictor drugs into the arm circulation of normal subjects reproduced the clinical situation of normal arterial pressure with absent Korotkoff sounds and diminished radial pulses. High vascular resistance in the upper extremity prevents the hemodynamic events which normally produce the Korotkoff sounds. Disappearance of peripheral pulses is probably the result of reduced stroke volume and increased arterial wall stiffness.