Does multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty improve clinical or economical outcomes compared to culprit-lesion-only treatment in patients with acute myocardial infarction?
Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) undergoing primary angioplasty
Multivessel treatment (stenting) during primary angioplasty
Culprit lesion only initial treatment
Need for subsequent clinically driven revascularization, clinical advantages, and economical advantages
A staged approach to multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty for AMI is preferred, as initial aggressive multivessel stenting offers no additional clinical or economic advantages.
Multivessel treatment during primary PTCA was safe in this controlled trial. However, when only the culprit lesion was initially treated, the need for subsequent clinically driven revascularization remained low and no clinical or economical advantages were obtainable with a more aggressive initial approach. In clinical practice, a staged approach to multivessel treatment during primary angioplasty avoids to treat unnecessarily non clinically relevant lesions.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mario et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6871c49dce5ab9d88b460 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14628840310030441
Carlo Di Mario
Interventional Cardiology
Mara Sansa
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”
Flavio Airoldi
Interventional / Structural Cardiology
International Journal of Cardiovascular Interventions
University of Padua
University of Pisa
Royal Brompton Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...