The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) increased significantly from 16.9±6.5 U to 25.9±14.4 U after disruption of the microcirculation (P =0.002).
Does the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) correlate with true microcirculatory resistance (TMR) in a swine model?
9 Yorkshire swine in an open-chest model
Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) derived from a coronary pressure wire
True microcirculatory resistance (TMR) derived from an external ultrasonic flow probe
Correlation between IMR and TMRsurrogate
IMR is a novel, simple, and quantitative invasive index that accurately assesses coronary microcirculatory resistance independent of epicardial stenosis in a preclinical model.
Background— A relatively simple, invasive method for quantitatively assessing the status of the coronary microcirculation independent of the epicardial artery is lacking. Methods and Results— By using a coronary pressure wire and modified software, it is possible to calculate the mean transit time of room-temperature saline injected down a coronary artery. The inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time has been shown to correlate with absolute flow. We hypothesize that distal coronary pressure divided by the inverse of the hyperemic mean transit time provides an index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) that will correlate with true microcirculatory resistance (TMR), defined as the distal left anterior descending (LAD) pressure divided by hyperemic flow, measured with an external ultrasonic flow probe. A total of 61 measurements were made in 9 Yorkshire swine at baseline and after disruption of the coronary microcirculation, both with and without an epicardial LAD stenosis. The mean IMR (16.9±6.5 U to 25.9±14.4 U, P =0.002) and TMR (0.51±0.14 to 0.79±0.32 mm Hg · mL −1 · min −1 , P =0.0001), as well as the % change in IMR (147±66%) and TMR (159±105%, P =NS versus IMR % change), increased significantly and to a similar degree after disruption of the microcirculation. These changes were independent of the status of the epicardial artery. There was a significant correlation between mean IMR and TMR values, as well as between the % change in IMR and % change in TMR. Conclusion— Measuring IMR may provide a simple, quantitative, invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
William F. Fearon
Leora B. Balsam
H.M. Omar Farouque
Circulation
Stanford University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Fearon et al. (Tue,) reported a other. The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) increased significantly from 16.9±6.5 U to 25.9±14.4 U after disruption of the microcirculation (P =0.002).
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/696bdcb272d15f53efa1e697 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000080700.98607.d1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: