Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract We examine the controversial practice of using parcels of items as manifest variables in structural equation modeling (SEM) procedures. After detailing arguments pro and con, we conclude that the unconsidered use of parcels is never warranted, while, at the same time, the considered use of parcels cannot be dismissed out of hand. In large part, the decision to parcel or not depends on one's philosophical stance regarding scientific inquiry (e.g., empiricist vs. pragmatist) and the substantive goal of a study (e.g., to understand the structure of a set of items or to examine the nature of a set of constructs). Prior to creating parcels, however, we recommend strongly that investigators acquire a thorough understanding of the nature and dimensionality of the items to be parceled. With this knowledge in hand, various techniques for creating parcels can be utilized to minimize potential pitfalls and to optimize the measurement structure of constructs in SEM procedures. A number of parceling techniques are described, noting their strengths and weaknesses.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Todd D. Little
William A. Cunningham
Golan Shahar
Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
Yale University
California Department of Education
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Little et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69cbc42b7d52db8d17d842fd — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: