Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Researchers, commentators, and politicians have devoted steadily more attention to infrastructure in response to claims that inadequate accumulation of public capital has contributed to substandard US economic growth. Despite this, the link between infrastructure and productivity growth remains controversial. In this regard, it is somewhat surprising that infrastructure research has developed in isolation from the large literature on economic growth. We develop a neoclassical growth model that explicitly incorporates infrastructure and is designed to provide a tractable framework within which to analyze the empirical importance of public capital accumulation to productivity growth. We find little support for claims of a dramatic productivity boost from increased infrastructure outlays. In a specification designed to provide an upper bound for the influence of infrastructure, we estimate that raising the rate of infrastructure investment would have had a negligible impact on annual productivity growth between 1971 and 1986.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Douglas Holtz‐Eakin
Pepperdine University
Amy Ellen Schwartz
National Bureau of Economic Research
Regional Science and Urban Economics
New York University
Syracuse University
Wagner College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Holtz‐Eakin et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12c68b5bb7edc7189e440f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(94)02080-z