Isolated CABG in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF <30%) yielded a 77.7% 5-year survival and significantly lower 1-year mortality compared to no revascularization (OR 0.36).
Cohort (n=7,841)
Yes
Does isolated CABG improve survival in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction compared to nonrevascularized patients?
Isolated CABG in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF <30%) carries an acceptable perioperative mortality risk and provides a significant 1-year survival benefit compared to no revascularization.
Effect estimate: HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.49 to 2.62)
Absolute Event Rate: 77.7% vs 91.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is indicated in patients with coronary artery disease and impaired ventricular function. However, earlier studies have suggested that prognosis of patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction is extremely poor. We used the APPROACH registry to derive contemporary estimates of prognosis associated with CABG for this high-risk patient population. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study group consisted of 7841 patients who had isolated CABG in the province of Alberta, Canada between 1996 and 2001. Patients with markedly reduced left ventricular function (ejection fraction EF 50%, normal Nl EF, n=4830). The operative mortality was higher in the patient group with Lo EF (4.6%) compared with Med EF and Nl EF groups (3.4% and 1.9%, respectively, P<0.001). At 5 years, survival was 77.7% for Lo EF patients compared with 85.5% and 91.2% for Med EF and Nl EF patients, respectively (P<0.001). After controlling for other independent variables, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.98 (95% CI, 1.49 to 2.62) for Lo EF relative to Nl EF. The mortality rate at 1 year was significantly lower for Lo EF patients who underwent CABG than it was for nonrevascularized Lo EF patients (risk-adjusted odds ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: In the modern era of cardiac surgery, CABG can be performed in Lo EF cases with an acceptable perioperative mortality risk. Our estimate of 5-year survival in this high-risk group is better than previously reported in the literature from earlier periods.
Appoo et al. (Mon,) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease with left ventricular dysfunction (n=7,841). Isolated CABG in severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF <30%) vs. Isolated CABG in normal ventricular function (EF >50%) was evaluated on 5-year survival (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.49 to 2.62, p=<0.001). Isolated CABG in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction (EF <30%) yielded a 77.7% 5-year survival and significantly lower 1-year mortality compared to no revascularization (OR 0.36).