Some Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Screening Programs

Feinleib et al. (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a12abd392637892a9a707b5 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00039896.1969.10666863

Also consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1. Lead Time Gained by Diagnostic Screening for Breast Cancer<xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN2">2</xref><xref ref-type="fn" rid="FN3">3</xref>· 1968 · 120 citations
2. Preliminary Findings of the Memphis-Shelby County Uterine Cancer Study and Their Interpretation· 1958 · 26 citations
3. The Concepts of Prevalence and Incidence as Applied to the Study of Development and Duration of Disease· 1968 · 2 citations
4. Morphogenesis of cervical cancer.Findings from San Diego County Cytology Registry· 1967 · 49 citations
5. The relationship between carcinoma in situ and invasive cervical carcinoma. A consideration of the contributions to the problem to be made from general population data· 1953 · 58 citations