Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper reports the results of research on a judgmental method for establishing standards on competency tests. The research had several objectives: first, to demonstrate the feasibility of a new, and somewhat more complex standardsetting method than has been used in the past; second, to examine the degree of similarity of standards recommended by judges having different types of interest and involvement in secondary education; third, to explore relationships between the background characteristics of judges and their recommended standards; fourth, to search for relationships between the characteristics of test items, and judges' assessments of their importance in contributing to decisions on whether students should
Richard M. Jaeger (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: