The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire demonstrated strong convergent validity (r=0.46-0.74, p<0.001) and high sensitivity to clinical changes over 3 months in patients with heart failure.
Observational
Congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=129)
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) vs Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and SF-36
Convergent validity of each KCCQ domain — r = 0.46 to 0.74, p=<0.001
OBJECTIVES: To create a valid, sensitive, disease-specific health status measure for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). BACKGROUND: Quantifying health status is becoming increasingly important for CHF. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) is a new, self-administered, 23-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-efficacy, social interference and quality of life. METHODS: To establish the performance characteristics of the KCCQ, two distinct patient cohorts were recruited: 70 stable and 59 decompensated CHF patients with ejection fractions of <40. Upon entry into the study, patients were administered the KCCQ, the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). Questionnaires were repeated three months later. RESULTS: Convergent validity of each KCCQ domain was documented by comparison with available criterion standards (r = 0.46 to 0.74; p < 0.001 for all). Among those with stable CHF who remained stable by predefined criteria (n = 39), minimal changes in KCCQ domains were detected over three months of observation (mean change = 0.8 to 4.0 points, p = NS for all). In contrast, large changes in score were observed among patients whose decompensated CHF improved three months later (n = 39; mean change = 15.4 to 40.4 points, p < 0.01 for all). The sensitivity of the KCCQwas substantially greater than that of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure and the SF-36 questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: The KCCQis a valid, reliable and responsive health status measure for patients with CHF and may serve as a clinically meaningful outcome in cardiovascular research, patient management and quality assessment.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
C.Patrick Green
Charles Porter
Dennis R. Bresnahan
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
University of Missouri–Kansas City
Saint Luke's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Green et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Congestive heart failure (CHF) (n=129). Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) vs. Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire and SF-36 was evaluated on Convergent validity of each KCCQ domain (r = 0.46 to 0.74, p=<0.001). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire demonstrated strong convergent validity (r=0.46-0.74, p<0.001) and high sensitivity to clinical changes over 3 months in patients with heart failure.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69efd2c1b8a53e2a171bc988 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00531-3
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: