Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper reports a controlled trial of human and computer-aided diagnosis in a series of 552 patients with acute abdominal pain. The overall diagnostic accuracy of the computer-aided system was 91.5% and that of the senior clinician to see each case was 81.2%. However, the clinician's diagnostic performance improved markedly during the period of the trial. The proportion of appendices which perforated before operation fell from 36% to 4% during the trial, and the negative laparotomy rate dropped sharply. After the trial closed in August 1972 these figures reverted towards their pretrial levels.It is suggested that while computer-aided diagnosis is a valuable direct adjunct to the clinician dealing with the "acute abdomen," he may also benefit in the short-term from the constant feedback he receives and from the disciplines and constraints involved in communicating with the computer.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
F T de Dombal
Leeds General Infirmary
D J Leaper
North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust
J C Horrocks
University of Leeds
BMJ
Leeds General Infirmary
Urology Team
Informa (Italy)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Dombal et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ad2af334bc3615daca295 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.1.5904.376