Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In recent years, discourse analysis has been deployed by academics as a methodology to understand the urban policy implementation process, in particular, the ways in which key actors exercise power. Much of the discourse-based research in urban policy has drawn upon the writings of Norman Fairclough and Michel Foucault and seeks to provide a critical scrutiny of texts and utterances of policy makers and other key actors. The methodological assumption that informs discourse-based approaches is that politics is an arena in which different interest groups seek to establish a particular narrative or version of events as a means to pursue political objectives. This article begins by setting out the theoretical influences that have informed discourse analysis. There then follows a discussion of some of the studies that have deployed discourse-based research within urban policy, an evaluation of its strengths and weaknesses as a method and an assessment for new areas of enquiry. The article's conclusion is that discourse analysis provides the researcher with a set of tools to interpret urban policy in a theoretically informed and insightful way. However, there are some pitfalls associated with its techniques that require consideration before any analysis should commence.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Keith Jacobs
The University of Sydney
Urban Policy and Research
University of Tasmania
Jacobs (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Keith Jacobs (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a11c23ad4922d3d9bc90996 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817