Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The data analyzed were the 14 WAIS-R scores from each of the individuals who comprised the WAIS-R standardization sample. Examined was the individual VIQ-PIQ difference from only the initial examination of each of the 1880 subjects, as well as the test-retest change in each of the 14 WAIS-R scores for each of the 119 subjects who were retested. The results revealed that, although the WAIS-R has excellent psychometric reliability as reflected in its standard error of measurement of a VIQ-PIQ difference and its impressively high test-retest Pearson r values, the actual magnitudes of the differences between the VIQ and PIQ assessed in a single examination, or the magnitudes of gain or loss in the 14 scores on retest, for some of these normal individuals were sufficiently high that such base-rate data should be routinely considered by clinical neuropsychologists and other practitioners.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Joseph D. Matarazzo
Marquette University
David O. Herman
Analysis and Measurement Services (United States)
Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
Oregon Health & Science University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matarazzo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a19a2442f689499b5f6547f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638408401227
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: