Non-invasive ultrasound Doppler determination of effective mitral orifice area strongly correlated with conventional catheterization methods (r=0.975) for quantifying mitral flow obstruction.
Observational (n=10)
Mitral stenosis (n=10)
Ultrasound Doppler method vs Conventional catheterization method (revised Gorlin formula)
Correlation between effective orifice area calculated from ultrasound data and geometric orifice area from catheterization — r=0.975
Effect estimate: r=0.975
Ten patients with mitral stenosis, but without mitral insufficiency, have been studied during cardiac catheterization. The mitral orifice blood velocities, the mitral pressure gradient, and the mitral flow rate were determined with ultrasound, manometry, and the direct Fick method, respectively. The effective orifice area was calculated from the ultrasound data and the mitral flow rate. The geometric orifice area was calculated from the pressure gradient and the mitral flow rate, using a revised Gorlin formula. A comparison of the two methods showed a correlation coefficient of 0.975. The investigation demonstrated that the ultrasound method represents an alternative to the conventional catheterization methods used for the quantification of mitral flow obstruction.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Jarle Holen
SINTEF
Rune Aaslid
University of Bern
Knud Landmark
Oslo University Hospital
Acta Medica Scandinavica
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Holen et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Mitral stenosis (n=10). Ultrasound Doppler method vs. Conventional catheterization method (revised Gorlin formula) was evaluated on Correlation between effective orifice area calculated from ultrasound data and geometric orifice area from catheterization (r=0.975). Non-invasive ultrasound Doppler determination of effective mitral orifice area strongly correlated with conventional catheterization methods (r=0.975) for quantifying mitral flow obstruction.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ecbd01c5e2d2319f9e26f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1977.tb15660.x