Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Accepting a fixed trade-off between environmental regulation and competitiveness unnecessarily raises costs and slows down environmental progress. Studies finding high environmental compliance costs have traditionally focused on static cost impacts, ignoring any offsetting productivity benefits from innovation. They typically overestimated compliance costs, neglected innovation offsets, and disregarded the affected industry's initial competitiveness. Rather than simply adding to cost, properly crafted environmental standards can trigger innovation offsets, allowing companies to improve their resource productivity. Shifting the debate from pollution control to pollution prevention was a step forward. It is now necessary to make the next step and focus on resource productivity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Michael E. Porter
Claas van der Linde
The Journal of Economic Perspectives
Harvard University
University of St.Gallen
University of Applied Sciences St. Gallen
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Porter et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6a9f4733a2b54c8aa7f1d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97