Adding dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation did not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to PVAI alone (57% vs 60%, P=0.18).
Cohort (n=80)
Does adding dominant frequency (DF)-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
The addition of dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation does not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Absolute Event Rate: 57% vs 60%
p-value: p=0.18
BACKGROUND: Sites of high DF are potential targets for AF ablation, but it is unknown if addition of DF ablation can improve procedural outcome. OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) examine the relationship between DF sites and complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and (2) prospectively assess the long-term outcome of adding DF ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) for persistent AF. METHODS: First, 20 patients with persistent AF who underwent previous CFE-guided ablation and who had AF terminate during ablation were studied retrospectively (group I). Bipolar, 8-second electrograms were collected by a circular catheter (288 ± 86 points/map). The EnSite NavX system allows for automated display of both CFE and DF maps. Electrograms with cycle length 8 Hz (direct inverse relationship). Sites of AF termination were related to CFE and DF sites. Based on these observations, 30 different patients (group II) with persistent AF prospectively underwent DF-guided ablation plus PVAI. They were followed every 3 months for 1 year (visit, Holter, ECG). These patients were compared to case-matched controls undergoing PVAI alone (group III). RESULTS: In group I, there was a significant, inverse correlation between DF and CFE values at each point (r =-0.24, P 30 seconds occurred in 57% of DF+PVAI compared to 60% in patients receiving PVAI alone (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: DF and CFE regions overlap only about 50%. AF termination retrospectively occurred on overlapping CFE/DF sites where DF was above the mean. However, prospective ablation of DF sites plus PVAI resulted in low AF termination rates, and did not improve 1 year success over PVAI alone.
Verma et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=80). Dominant frequency (DF)-guided ablation plus pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) vs. PVAI alone was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmia > 30 seconds at 1 year (p=0.18). Adding dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation did not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to PVAI alone (57% vs 60%, P=0.18).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: