Key result
Adding dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation did not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to PVAI alone.
Why the study?
Does adding dominant frequency (DF)-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=80)
Does adding dominant frequency (DF)-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The addition of dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation does not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
BACKGROUND: Sites of high DF are potential targets for AF ablation, but it is unknown if addition of DF ablation can improve procedural outcome. OBJECTIVES: We sought to (1) examine the relationship between DF sites and complex fractionated electrograms (CFE) and (2) prospectively assess the long-term outcome of adding DF ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) for persistent AF. METHODS: First, 20 patients with persistent AF who underwent previous CFE-guided ablation and who had AF terminate during ablation were studied retrospectively (group I). Bipolar, 8-second electrograms were collected by a circular catheter (288 ± 86 points/map). The EnSite NavX system allows for automated display of both CFE and DF maps. Electrograms with cycle length <120 ms were considered CFE and were compared to DF sites > 8 Hz (direct inverse relationship). Sites of AF termination were related to CFE and DF sites. Based on these observations, 30 different patients (group II) with persistent AF prospectively underwent DF-guided ablation plus PVAI. They were followed every 3 months for 1 year (visit, Holter, ECG). These patients were compared to case-matched controls undergoing PVAI alone (group III). RESULTS: In group I, there was a significant, inverse correlation between DF and CFE values at each point (r =-0.24, P < 0.001). DF surface area was less than CFE area (27 ± 5 cm(2) vs 34 ± 4 cm(2) , P = 0.03). CFE sites overlapped 48 ± 27% with the DF surface area. Nonoverlapping CFE sites were contiguous to DF sites. AF termination occurred where DF and CFE overlapped, and at these sites, DF was always greater than the mean DF for the map. In group II, all DF sites above the mean value were prospectively ablated during AF. AF termination was noted in only 2/30 (7%) patients. After DF ablation, PVAI was performed and termination increased to 4/30 patients (14%). At 1 year, freedom from atrial arrhythmia > 30 seconds occurred in 57% of DF+PVAI compared to 60% in patients receiving PVAI alone (P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: DF and CFE regions overlap only about 50%. AF termination retrospectively occurred on overlapping CFE/DF sites where DF was above the mean. However, prospective ablation of DF sites plus PVAI resulted in low AF termination rates, and did not improve 1 year success over PVAI alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=80). Dominant frequency (DF)-guided ablation plus pulmonary vein antral isolation (PVAI) vs. PVAI alone was evaluated on Freedom from atrial arrhythmia > 30 seconds at 1 year (p=0.18). Adding dominant frequency-guided ablation to pulmonary vein antral isolation did not improve 1-year freedom from atrial arrhythmia compared to PVAI alone.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: