Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
In a laboratory study, the presence of individual- or work-group-level electronic performance monitoring (EPM) was manipulated as participants worked on a data-entry task alone, as a member of a noninteracting aggregate, or as a member of a cohesive group. The pattern of results suggested the operation of a social facilitation effect, as highly skilled monitored participants keyed more entries than highly skilled nonmonitored participants. The opposite pattern was detected among low-skilled participants. No signs of social loafing were detected among group-monitored participants. Nonmonitored workers and members of cohesive groups felt the least stressed. The implications of these findings for organizations adopting EPM systems are discussed.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John R. Aiello
Kathryn J. Kolb
View
Journal of Applied Psychology
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Aiello et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69deca844838c5c0bab0d0cf — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.3.339