Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
CONTEXT: The Centers for Medicare dually eligible: 381, 95% CI, 247-515; nondually eligible: 85, 95% CI, 32-138). There was significant variation in savings across practice groups, ranging from an overall mean per-capita annual saving of 866 (95% CI, 815-918) to an increase in expenditures of 749 (95% CI, 698-799). Thirty-day medical readmissions decreased overall (-0. 67%, 95% CI, -1. 11% to -0. 23%) and in the dually eligible (-1. 07%, 95% CI, -1. 73% to -0. 41%), while surgical readmissions decreased only for the dually eligible (-2. 21%, 95% CI, -3. 07% to -1. 34%). Estimates were sensitive to the risk-adjustment method. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial PGPD savings achieved by some participating institutions were offset by a lack of saving at other participating institutions. Most of the savings were concentrated among dually eligible beneficiaries.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Carrie H. Colla
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
David E. Wennberg
Cross-Cutting Cardiology
Ellen Meara
Dartmouth College
JAMA
National Bureau of Economic Research
Dartmouth College
Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Colla et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20b2b3fb15484991e51de6 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.10812
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: