Home telemonitoring did not significantly reduce the percentage of days lost to death or hospitalization compared to nurse telephone support (12.7% vs 15.9%) over 240 days.
RCT (n=426)
2:2:1 ratio
Does home telemonitoring reduce days dead or hospitalized in patients with recent heart failure admission and LVEF <40%?
426 patients with a recent admission for heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, 48% aged >70 years.
Home telemonitoring (HTM) consisting of twice-daily patient self-measurement of weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and rhythm with automated devices linked to a cardiology center.
Nurse telephone support (NTS) by specialist nurses, or usual care (UC) delivered by primary care physicians.
Days dead or hospitalized with NTS versus HTM at 240 days.composite
Home telemonitoring did not significantly reduce the primary composite of days dead or hospitalized compared to nurse telephone support or usual care, though it may reduce admission duration.
Absolute Event Rate: 12.7% vs 15.9%
p-value: p=no significant difference
OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify whether home telemonitoring (HTM) improves outcomes compared with nurse telephone support (NTS) and usual care (UC) for patients with heart failure who are at high risk of hospitalization or death. BACKGROUND: Heart failure is associated with a high rate of hospitalization and poor prognosis. Telemonitoring could help implement and maintain effective therapy and detect worsening heart failure and its cause promptly to prevent medical crises. METHODS: Patients with a recent admission for heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 70 years, mean LVEF was 25% (SD, 8) and median plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was 3,070 pg/ml (interquartile range 1,285 to 6,749 pg/ml). During 240 days of follow-up, 19.5%, 15.9%, and 12.7% of days were lost as the result of death or hospitalization for UC, NTS, and HTM, respectively (no significant difference). The number of admissions and mortality were similar among patients randomly assigned to NTS or HTM, but the mean duration of admissions was reduced by 6 days (95% confidence interval 1 to 11) with HTM. Patients randomly assigned to receive UC had higher one-year mortality (45%) than patients assigned to receive NTS (27%) or HTM (29%) (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation and refinement of the application of HTM are warranted because it may be a valuable role for the management of selected patients with heart failure.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
John G.F. Cleland
Imperial College London
Amala A. Louis
University of Hull
Alan S. Rigby
University of Hull
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Erasmus University Rotterdam
Erasmus MC
University of Hull
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cleland et al. (Sun,) conducted a rct in Heart failure (n=426). Home telemonitoring (HTM) vs. Nurse telephone support (NTS) and usual care (UC) was evaluated on Days dead or hospitalized with NTS versus HTM at 240 days (p=no significant difference). Home telemonitoring did not significantly reduce the percentage of days lost to death or hospitalization compared to nurse telephone support (12.7% vs 15.9%) over 240 days.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a175fc9fdad18fa9b3b5da8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.01.050
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: