Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
It is traditional to make the interface between an actuator and its load as stiff as possible. Despite this tradition, reducing interface stiffness offers a number of advantages, including greater shock tolerance, lower reflected inertia, more accurate and stable force control, less inadvertent damage to the environment, and the capacity for energy storage. As a trade-off, reducing interface stiffness also lowers zero motion force bandwidth. In this paper, the authors propose that for natural tasks, zero motion force bandwidth isn't everything, and incorporating series elasticity as a purposeful element within the actuator is a good idea. The authors use the term elasticity instead of compliance to indicate the presence of a passive mechanical spring in the actuator. After a discussion of the trade-offs inherent in series elastic actuators, the authors present a control system for their use under general force or impedance control. The authors conclude with test results from a revolute series-elastic actuator meant for the arms of the MIT humanoid robot Cog and for a small planetary rover.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gill A. Pratt
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Matthew M. Williamson
University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Intel (United States)
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Pratt et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e175ff48da8e88a6b96fa8 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.1995.525827