Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Statistical power analysis provides the conventional approach to assess error rates when designing a research study. However, power analysis is flawed in that a narrow emphasis on statistical significance is placed as the primary focus of study design. In noisy, small-sample settings, statistically significant results can often be misleading. To help researchers address this problem in the context of their own studies, we recommend design calculations in which (a) the probability of an estimate being in the wrong direction (Type S sign error) and (b) the factor by which the magnitude of an effect might be overestimated (Type M magnitude error or exaggeration ratio) are estimated. We illustrate with examples from recent published research and discuss the largest challenge in a design calculation: coming up with reasonable estimates of plausible effect sizes based on external information.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Andrew Gelman
John B. Carlin
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Columbia University
The University of Melbourne
Murdoch Children's Research Institute
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Gelman et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d7356bef4aa71f97f307c7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614551642