Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Education, from a student perspective, is largely driven by assessment. An effective assessment tool should beboth valid and reliable, yet this is often not achieved. The aim of this literature review is to identify and appraisethe evidence base for assessment tools used primarily in evaluating clinical skills of dental students.Methods: MEDLINE was searched for all relevant articles from January 1950- January 2011 published in theEnglish language. References of the articles were then hand searched.This review begins with a brief outline of the student learning process and the aim of assessment. The toolsavailable for both formative and summative assessments are discussed, with particular reference to those used inassessing dental students’ clinical ability. The problems of subjectivity and assessor variability associated withtraditional teacher-led assessments are highlighted. Methods which have attempted to overcome these problems,such as the use of checklists and training are then discussed. The benefits and shortcomings of the use ofstudents as assessors, both in self and peer assessment are reviewed. Finally, the use of objective assessmentmethods involving opto-electronic and haptic technology is considered.
Taylor et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: