Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper discusses some principles of critical discourse analysis, such as the explicit sociopolitical stance of discourse analysts, and a focus on dominance relations by elite groups and institutions as they are being enacted, legitimated or otherwise reproduced by text and talk. One of the crucial elements of this analysis of the relations between power and discourse is the patterns of access to (public) discourse for different social groups. Theoretically it is shown that in order to be able to relate power and discourse in an explicit way, we need the `cognitive interface' of models, knowledge, attitudes and ideologies and other social representations of the social mind, which also relate the individual and the social, and the micro- and the macro-levels of social structure. Finally, the argument is illustrated with an analysis of parliamentary debates about ethnic affairs.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teun A. van Dijk
Triangle : Action, Discours, Pensée politique et économique
Discourse & Society
University of Amsterdam
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Teun A. van Dijk (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69cd3715534de42e95cf434f — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006