The Influence of Auditors' Justification Processes on Their Decisions: A Cognitive Model and Experimental Evidence

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Mark E. Peecher, The Influence of Auditors' Justification Processes on Their Decisions: A Cognitive Model and Experimental Evidence, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 34, No. 1 (Spring, 1996), pp. 125-140

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay

Cite This Study

Mark E. Peecher (Mon,) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c7a005712c53037e8aaf9 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2491335

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Causal information search in managerial decision making1991 · 33 citations
2Good judgment in public accounting: Quality and justification*1987 · 103 citations
3Peer Pressure and Partnerships1992 · 1,794 citations
4The Curse of Knowledge in Economic Settings: An Experimental Analysis1989 · 764 citations
5Designing Experiments and Analysing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective.1991 · 1,234 citations

Mark Helpful

Bookmark

Relay