Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI compared with clopidogrel (7.4% vs 9.7%; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.85; P<0.0001) in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
RCT (n=13,608)
Yes
Acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=13,608)
Prasugrel vs Clopidogrel
Overall risk of MI — HR 0.76 (0.67 to 0.85), p=<0.0001
Effect estimate: HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.85)
Absolute Event Rate: 7.4% vs 9.7%
p-value: p=<0.0001
BACKGROUND: Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine that reduces new or recurrent myocardial infarctions (MIs) compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This effect must be balanced against an increased bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the effect of prasugrel with respect to the type, size, and timing of MI using the universal classification of MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention randomized to prasugrel or clopidogrel and treated for 6 to 15 months in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38). Each MI underwent supplemental classification as spontaneous, secondary, or sudden cardiac death (types 1, 2, and 3) or procedure related (Types 4 and 5) and examined events occurring early and after 30 days. Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI (7.4% versus 9.7%; hazard ratio HR, 0.76; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.67 to 0.85; P or =5 times the reference limit (HR. 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86; P=0.0001). In landmark analyses starting at 30 days, patients treated with prasugrel had a lower risk of any MI (2.9% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.77; P=0.014), including nonprocedural MI (2.3% versus 3.1%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P=0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel for up to 15 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the risk of MIs that are procedure related and spontaneous and those that are small and large, including new MIs occurring during maintenance therapy.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Morrow et al. (Tue,) conducted a rct in Acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (n=13,608). Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Overall risk of MI (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.85, p=<0.0001). Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI compared with clopidogrel (7.4% vs 9.7%; HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.67-0.85; P<0.0001) in patients with ACS undergoing PCI.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a183ca7d990e918e6b511fe — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.108.833665
David A. Morrow
General Cardiology
Stephen D. Wiviott
General Cardiology
Harvey D. White
Interventional Cardiology
Circulation
Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione
Auckland City Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...