Renal dysfunction affects NT-proBNP more than BNP, while their molar ratio remains the most consistent marker across varying left ventricular ejection fractions (slopes 0.148-0.337, r2 >0.96).
Observational (n=94)
Renal function, gender, and LVEF significantly affect BNP and NT-proBNP levels, making the NT-proBNP/BNP ratio a more consistent cardiac biomarker across varying LVEFs.
We examined the effect of renal dysfunction on B-natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal (NT)-proBNP, and their molar ratio at varying severities of cardiac function in 94 Thai patients with chest pain (52 men; 32 women), also measuring creatinine and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Renal function was classified into 5 stages by estimated glomerular filtration rate. The molar NT-proBNP/BNP ratio was calculated. Cardiac status was classified by LVEF (normal, >50%; moderate, 35%-50%; severe, or=0.95). BNP and the ratio are affected less than NT-proBNP by renal dysfunction, starting in stage III; NT-proBNP expresses effects starting in stage II. NT-proBNP is more sensitive than BNP to renal disease stage. For log of geometric means vs stage of renal disease, the BNP slopes and correlation coefficients vary considerably (slopes, 0.036-0.531; r(2), 0.017-0.99). The NT-proBNP slopes and regression coefficients vary considerably (slopes, 0.18-0.71; r(2), 0.33-0.99). For the ratio, the slopes show low variation (0.148-0.337), r(2) greater than 0.96, women differing from men (P = .012). The effect of renal disease differs by gender. BNP and NT-proBNP increase by stage III for women but not for men. One must consider renal function, gender, and LVEF when using BNP or NT-proBNP as cardiac biomarkers. The ratio of the 2 peptides is the most consistent marker across LVEFs.
Srisawasdi et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Chest pain (n=94). Renal dysfunction vs. Normal renal function was evaluated on BNP, NT-proBNP, and their molar ratio. Renal dysfunction affects NT-proBNP more than BNP, while their molar ratio remains the most consistent marker across varying left ventricular ejection fractions (slopes 0.148-0.337, r2 >0.96).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: