PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 19, 2009American Journal of Clinical Pathology159 citations

The Effect of Renal Dysfunction on BNP, NT-proBNP, and Their Ratio

View Full Paper
PSPornpen SrisawasdiSVSomlak VanavananCCCharaslak Charoenpanichkit

Key Result

Renal dysfunction affects NT-proBNP more than BNP, while their molar ratio remains the most consistent marker across varying left ventricular ejection fractions (slopes 0.148-0.337, r2 >0.96).

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=94)

Structured PICO

P
Population
94 Thai patients with chest pain evaluated for the effect of renal dysfunction on natriuretic peptides across varying severities of cardiac function.
O
Outcome
Effect of renal dysfunction on B-natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal (NT)-proBNP, and their molar ratiosurrogate

Renal function, gender, and LVEF significantly affect BNP and NT-proBNP levels, making the NT-proBNP/BNP ratio a more consistent cardiac biomarker across varying LVEFs.

Abstract

We examined the effect of renal dysfunction on B-natriuretic peptide (BNP), N-terminal (NT)-proBNP, and their molar ratio at varying severities of cardiac function in 94 Thai patients with chest pain (52 men; 32 women), also measuring creatinine and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Renal function was classified into 5 stages by estimated glomerular filtration rate. The molar NT-proBNP/BNP ratio was calculated. Cardiac status was classified by LVEF (normal, >50%; moderate, 35%-50%; severe, or=0.95). BNP and the ratio are affected less than NT-proBNP by renal dysfunction, starting in stage III; NT-proBNP expresses effects starting in stage II. NT-proBNP is more sensitive than BNP to renal disease stage. For log of geometric means vs stage of renal disease, the BNP slopes and correlation coefficients vary considerably (slopes, 0.036-0.531; r(2), 0.017-0.99). The NT-proBNP slopes and regression coefficients vary considerably (slopes, 0.18-0.71; r(2), 0.33-0.99). For the ratio, the slopes show low variation (0.148-0.337), r(2) greater than 0.96, women differing from men (P = .012). The effect of renal disease differs by gender. BNP and NT-proBNP increase by stage III for women but not for men. One must consider renal function, gender, and LVEF when using BNP or NT-proBNP as cardiac biomarkers. The ratio of the 2 peptides is the most consistent marker across LVEFs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Srisawasdi et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Chest pain (n=94). Renal dysfunction vs. Normal renal function was evaluated on BNP, NT-proBNP, and their molar ratio. Renal dysfunction affects NT-proBNP more than BNP, while their molar ratio remains the most consistent marker across varying left ventricular ejection fractions (slopes 0.148-0.337, r2 >0.96).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a535f09a4dcbf5d3f1fb37bhttps://doi.org/10.1309/ajcp60htpgigfcnk
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Concentrations Predict the Progression of Nondiabetic Chronic Kidney Disease: The Mild-to-Moderate Kidney Disease Study2007 · 123 citations
  2. 2The Clinical Challenge of Cardiorenal Syndrome2004 · 170 citations
  3. 3Performance Characteristics of Four Automated Natriuretic Peptide Assays2005 · 95 citations
  4. 4The potential to improve primary prevention in the future by using BNP/N-BNP as an indicator of silent 'pancardiac' target organ damage: BNP/N-BNP could become for the heart what microalbuminuria is for the kidney2007 · 75 citations
  5. 5Goodpasture syndrome during the course of a Schönlein-Henoch purpura2002 · 1,474 citations