Biventricular pacing prevented adverse left ventricular remodeling and reduction in ejection fraction compared to conventional right ventricular apical pacing in patients with normal systolic function
Does biventricular pacing prevent adverse left ventricular remodeling and reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction compared to right ventricular apical pacing in patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction?
Patients with a normal left ventricular ejection fraction (≥45%) and standard indications for pacing (sinus-node dysfunction and bradycardia due to advanced atrioventricular block)
Atrial-synchronized biventricular pacing
Right ventricular apical pacing
Left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-systolic volume at 12 monthssurrogate
In patients with bradycardia and normal ejection fraction, biventricular pacing prevents the adverse left ventricular remodeling and decline in systolic function caused by conventional right ventricular apical pacing.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
In patients with normal systolic function, conventional right ventricular apical pacing resulted in adverse left ventricular remodeling and in a reduction in the left ventricular ejection fraction; these effects were prevented by biventricular pacing. (Centre for Clinical Trials number, CUHKCCT00037. )
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cheuk‐Man Yu
Qingdao University
Joseph Yat‐Sun Chan
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Qing Zhang
Huanggang Normal University
New England Journal of Medicine
Chinese University of Hong Kong
Sichuan University
Prince of Wales Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Yu et al. (Sun,) reported a other. Biventricular pacing prevented adverse left ventricular remodeling and reduction in ejection fraction compared to conventional right ventricular apical pacing in patients with normal systolic function.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69714deaf15775e61fbf1e40 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0907555
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: