Pre-eclamptic IUGR was associated with greater impairment in maternal diastolic function compared to normotensive IUGR (DTI early diastolic velocity Z-score -1.6 vs -0.17; P<0.01).
Observational (n=36)
Does maternal cardiac function differ between pregnancies complicated by normotensive versus pre-eclamptic intrauterine growth restriction?
Pre-eclamptic IUGR is associated with significantly greater impairment in maternal left ventricular diastolic function compared to normotensive IUGR, highlighting the added cardiovascular burden of pre-eclampsia.
Absolute Event Rate: -1.6% vs -0.17%
p-value: p=<0.01
OBJECTIVES: To compare maternal cardiac function between pregnancies complicated by normotensive and pre-eclamptic intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). METHODS: Two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography and Doppler tissue imaging (DTI) were used to examine 19 pregnant women with IUGR and 17 with pre-eclampsia complicated by IUGR at 20-38 weeks of gestation. Indices were converted into differences in SDs from the expected normal mean for gestation (Z-scores) and compared. RESULTS: With respect to normal pregnancy, in the normotensive IUGR compared with the pre-eclamptic IUGR group, there were similar reductions in maternal cardiac output (Z-score, - 1.71 vs. - 1.37, P = 0.26) and heart rate (Z-score, - 3.67 vs. - 9.43, P = 0.1) and a similar increase in total vascular resistance (Z-score, 2.91 vs. 3.93, P = 0.05). There was also a greater decrease in stroke volume (Z-score, - 1.72 vs. - 0.69, P = 0.01), a smaller increase in mean arterial pressure (Z-score, 0.73 vs. 2.94, P < 0.01) and a smaller decrease in DTI systolic velocity at the lateral mitral margin (Z-score, - 0.4 vs. - 1.42, P = 0.02). In terms of diastolic function, there was a smaller transmitral late diastolic velocity (Z-score, 0.04 vs. 0.93, P = 0.03) and a greater DTI early diastolic velocity at the lateral mitral margin (Z-score, - 0.17 vs. - 1.6, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In normotensive IUGR and pre-eclamptic IUGR there is a similar alteration in maternal left ventricular systolic function, but there is greater impairment in maternal diastolic function in pre-eclamptic IUGR.
Bamfo et al. (Wed,) conducted a observational in Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) (n=36). Pre-eclamptic IUGR vs. Normotensive IUGR was evaluated on DTI early diastolic velocity at the lateral mitral margin (Z-score) (p=<0.01). Pre-eclamptic IUGR was associated with greater impairment in maternal diastolic function compared to normotensive IUGR (DTI early diastolic velocity Z-score -1.6 vs -0.17; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: