Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
An unresolved issue in the field of implementation research is how to conceptualize and evaluate successful implementation. This paper advances the concept of "implementation outcomes" distinct from service system and clinical treatment outcomes. This paper proposes a heuristic, working "taxonomy" of eight conceptually distinct implementation outcomes-acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability-along with their nominal definitions. We propose a two-pronged agenda for research on implementation outcomes. Conceptualizing and measuring implementation outcomes will advance understanding of implementation processes, enhance efficiency in implementation research, and pave the way for studies of the comparative effectiveness of implementation strategies.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Enola K. Proctor
Hiie Silmere
Ramesh Raghavan
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
University of California, San Diego
Washington University in St. Louis
Roberts Wesleyan College
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Proctor et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d6ba99fca0359822aa8257 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: