Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
S ummary Assessment of infection is an essential part of many studies involving VA mycorrhiza. A summary is given of the range of techniques that have been used. We calculated the standard error of four methods of assessment based on observations of stained root samples either randomly arranged in a petri dish or mounted on microscope slides. The methods are based on presence or absence of infection at root/grid intersect points, on a visual estimate of percentage cortex occupied by fungus or on estimates of length, or presence or absence of infection in root pieces mounted on slides. The number of replicate observations required for a given standard error % infection can be read from the curves provided. The advantages of the different methods of assessment are discussed and reasons given why they all probably overestimate the true values.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Manuela Giovannetti
Barbara Mosse
New Phytologist
Experimental Station
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Giovannetti et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
www.synapsesocial.com/papers/69d71db83f906f6a06bef155 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1980.tb04556.x
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: