Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This 2006 survey of primary care physicians in Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States reveals striking differences in elements of practice systems that underpin quality and efficiency. Wide gaps exist between leading and lagging countries in clinical information systems and payment incentives. U.S. physicians are among the least likely to have extensive clinical information systems or incentives targeted on quality and the most likely to report that their patients have difficulty paying for care. Disease management capacity varies widely. Overall, findings highlight the importance of nationwide policies: Policy changes in the United States could lead to improved performance.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Cathy Schoen
Supélec
Robin Osborn
Commonwealth Fund
Phuong Trang Huynh
Hue University
Health Affairs
Commonwealth Fund
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Schoen et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0ee0dd1c5e2d2319fa051d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.25.w555
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: