RNA sequencing provided superior dynamic range and enhanced specificity for accurately quantifying lower-abundance genes compared to microarray analysis in a mouse cardiomyopathy model.
Mouse model of hypertrophy/cardiomyopathy (Galphaq transgenic and nontransgenic hearts) used to compare RNA sequencing and microarray transcriptional profiling.
RNA sequencing vs Microarray analysis
Differential mRNA expression and quantification of low-abundance genes
RATIONALE: Transcriptional profiling can detect subclinical heart disease and provide insight into disease etiology and functional status. Current microarray-based methods are expensive and subject to artifact. OBJECTIVE: To develop RNA sequencing methodologies using next generation massively parallel platforms for high throughput comprehensive analysis of individual mouse cardiac transcriptomes. To compare the results of sequencing- and array-based transcriptional profiling in the well-characterized Galphaq transgenic mouse hypertrophy/cardiomyopathy model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The techniques for preparation of individually bar-coded mouse heart RNA libraries for Illumina Genome Analyzer II resequencing are described. RNA sequencing showed that 234 high-abundance transcripts (>60 copies/cell) comprised 55% of total cardiac mRNA. Parallel transcriptional profiling of Galphaq transgenic and nontransgenic hearts by Illumina RNA sequencing and Affymetrix Mouse Gene 1.0 ST arrays revealed superior dynamic range for mRNA expression and enhanced specificity for reporting low-abundance transcripts by RNA sequencing. Differential mRNA expression in Galphaq and nontransgenic hearts correlated well between microarrays and RNA sequencing for highly abundant transcripts. RNA sequencing was superior to arrays for accurately quantifying lower-abundance genes, which represented the majority of the regulated genes in the Galphaq transgenic model. CONCLUSIONS: RNA sequencing is rapid, accurate, and sensitive for identifying both abundant and rare cardiac transcripts, and has significant advantages in time- and cost-efficiencies over microarray analysis.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Matkovich et al. (Fri,) conducted a other in Hypertrophy/cardiomyopathy. RNA sequencing vs. Microarray analysis was evaluated on Differential mRNA expression and quantification of low-abundance genes. RNA sequencing provided superior dynamic range and enhanced specificity for accurately quantifying lower-abundance genes compared to microarray analysis in a mouse cardiomyopathy model.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a219b6ccdf8429e7e5fdc08 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.110.217513
Scot J. Matkovich
Eli Lilly (United States)
Yan Zhang
Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University
Derek J. Van Booven
University of Miami
Circulation Research
Washington University in St. Louis
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...