The Gamma nail showed no difference in proximal fixation failure compared to the Dynamic Hip Screw (2 vs 3 cases), but was associated with four cases of femur fracture requiring major surgery.
RCT (n=100)
Intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur (n=100)
Gamma nail vs Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS)
Failure of proximal fixation (cut-out)
We have prospectively compared the fixation of 100 intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur in elderly patients with random use of either a Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) or a new intramedullary device, the Gamma nail. We found no difference in operating time, blood loss, wound complications, stay in hospital, place of eventual discharge, or the patients' mobility at final review. There was no difference in failure of proximal fixation: cut-out occurred in three cases with the DHS, and twice with the Gamma nail. However, in four cases fracture of the femur occurred close to the Gamma nail, requiring further major surgery. In the absence of these complications, union was seen by six months in both groups.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
SH Bridle
A.D. Patel
St George's Hospital
M. Bircher
Ashtead Hospital
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume
St George's Hospital
St George's Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Bridle et al. (Fri,) conducted a rct in Intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur (n=100). Gamma nail vs. Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) was evaluated on Failure of proximal fixation (cut-out). The Gamma nail showed no difference in proximal fixation failure compared to the Dynamic Hip Screw (2 vs 3 cases), but was associated with four cases of femur fracture requiring major surgery.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0931614c1e2db30bd2638e — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.73b2.2005167