Tissue Doppler echocardiography detected significantly lower systolic strain-rate in systemic sclerosis patients compared to matched controls (1.7 vs 3.8 cm-1, p<0.0001).
Case-Control (n=32)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.7% vs 3.8%
p-value: p=<0.0001
AIMS: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disorder characterized by frequent myocardial involvement. Alteration in left ventricular (LV) function is reported to be rare; however, it may be underestimated by conventional measurements. Our aim was to prospectively investigate LV function in SSc patients, using Tissue Doppler echocardiography (TDE), a modern and accurate method of assessing myocardial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive SSc patients with normal cardiac examination, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) and radionuclide LV ejection fraction (EF) were prospectively investigated. Myocardial perfusion was investigated using single-photon-emission computerized tomography (SPECT). Echocardiography (ECHO), systolic and diastolic strain-rate (SR) measured in the posterior wall by TDE were used to investigate myocardial function, and compared with results of 15 matched controls. All patients (53+/-8 years; 14 women; systolic PAP 33+/-6 mmHg; LVEF 67+/-8%) had myocardial SPECT perfusion abnormalities. Despite normal ECHO, they had lower systolic SR than controls (1.7+/-0.5 versus 3.8+/-1.7 cm-1, p<0.0001), and lower diastolic SR (3.7+/-1.5 versus 5.6+/-1.2 cm-1, p=0.0004). Ten SSc patients had reduced systolic SR<1.7 cm-1 and 11 reduced diastolic SR<3.5 cm-1. CONCLUSION: Frequent abnormal myocardial perfusion is confirmed in SSc patients. Reduced contractility is also frequent as detected by TDE, despite normal radionuclide LVEF.
Meune et al. (Tue,) conducted a case-control in Systemic sclerosis (n=32). Systemic sclerosis vs. Matched controls was evaluated on Systolic strain-rate (SR) measured in the posterior wall by TDE (p=<0.0001). Tissue Doppler echocardiography detected significantly lower systolic strain-rate in systemic sclerosis patients compared to matched controls (1.7 vs 3.8 cm-1, p<0.0001).