Does catheter ablation reduce healthcare utilization and expenditures in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is associated with significant and sustained reductions in healthcare utilization and expenditures, including in patients aged 65 and older.
AIM: The aim was to estimate the impact of catheter ablation on short- and long-term healthcare utilization and expenditures among atrial fibrillation (AF) patients in general and Medicare populations. METHODS: Data were analyzed from The MarketScan (®) Databases. MarketScan data contain deidentified patient-level records from employer-sponsored and public health insurance plans. Multivariable regression models for utilization and expenditures were built for all patients, with subanalyses performed for patients ≥65 years. Results were compared to preablation figures and reported for 5 time groups, based on duration of available postablation follow-up: 6-12 months; 12-18 months; 18-24 months; 24-30 months; and 30-36 months. RESULTS: A total of 3, 194 patients were identified who had undergone catheter ablation for treatment of AF, had continuous enrollment in the database 6 months prior to first ablation, and had at least 1-year follow-up postablation. Compared to the 6 months prior to ablation, there were significant reductions in the number of outpatient appointments, inpatient days, and emergency room visits in the total study population and in the subset ≥65 years. There was a statistically significant (P < 0. 01) decrease in total healthcare expenditures across 4 of the 5 6-month time periods, with annual savings ranging from 3, 300 to 9, 200. For patients ≥65 years, annual savings ranged from 3, 200 to 9, 200. Drug utilization also significantly declined (P < 0. 01), with average annual medication savings ranging from 670 to 890, and from 740 to 880 for patients ≥65 years. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation for AF reduced healthcare utilization and expenditures up to 3 years postablation. This reduction was consistent, significant, and had implications for general and Medicare populations.
Ladapo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.