Three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers generated consensus solutions among 11 groups, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%.
This study provides standardized benchmark problems and consensus solutions to verify the accuracy and replicability of current and future cardiac mechanics simulation software.
Models of cardiac mechanics are increasingly used to investigate cardiac physiology. These models are characterized by a high level of complexity, including the particular anisotropic material properties of biological tissue and the actively contracting material. A large number of independent simulation codes have been developed, but a consistent way of verifying the accuracy and replicability of simulations is lacking. To aid in the verification of current and future cardiac mechanics solvers, this study provides three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics. These benchmark problems test the ability to accurately simulate pressure-type forces that depend on the deformed objects geometry, anisotropic and spatially varying material properties similar to those seen in the left ventricle and active contractile forces. The benchmark was solved by 11 different groups to generate consensus solutions, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%, and consistent results between linear, quadratic and cubic finite elements as well as different approaches to simulating incompressible materials. Online tools and solutions are made available to allow these tests to be effectively used in verification of future cardiac mechanics software.
Land et al. (Tue,) conducted a other in Cardiac mechanics simulation. Benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers was evaluated on Consensus solutions for benchmark problems. Three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers generated consensus solutions among 11 groups, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%.