PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
December 1, 2015Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences122 citationsOpen Access

Verification of cardiac mechanics software: benchmark problems and solutions for testing active and passive material behaviour

SLSander LandSt Thomas' HospitalVGViatcheslav GurevTulane UniversitySASander ArensGhent University

Key Result

Three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers generated consensus solutions among 11 groups, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Cardiac mechanics simulation codes/solvers
I
Intervention
Three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics testing pressure-type forces, anisotropic and spatially varying material properties, and active contractile forces
O
Outcome
Accuracy and replicability of simulations (consensus solutions)

This study provides standardized benchmark problems and consensus solutions to verify the accuracy and replicability of current and future cardiac mechanics simulation software.

Abstract

Models of cardiac mechanics are increasingly used to investigate cardiac physiology. These models are characterized by a high level of complexity, including the particular anisotropic material properties of biological tissue and the actively contracting material. A large number of independent simulation codes have been developed, but a consistent way of verifying the accuracy and replicability of simulations is lacking. To aid in the verification of current and future cardiac mechanics solvers, this study provides three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics. These benchmark problems test the ability to accurately simulate pressure-type forces that depend on the deformed objects geometry, anisotropic and spatially varying material properties similar to those seen in the left ventricle and active contractile forces. The benchmark was solved by 11 different groups to generate consensus solutions, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%, and consistent results between linear, quadratic and cubic finite elements as well as different approaches to simulating incompressible materials. Online tools and solutions are made available to allow these tests to be effectively used in verification of future cardiac mechanics software.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Land et al. (2015) studied Cardiac mechanics simulation. Benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers was evaluated on Consensus solutions for benchmark problems. Three benchmark problems for cardiac mechanics solvers generated consensus solutions among 11 groups, with typical differences in higher-resolution solutions at approximately 0.5%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a23c0abffed3004559eece3https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0641
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Laminar structure of the heart: a mathematical model1997 · 269 citations
  2. 2Mouse and computational models link Mlc2v dephosphorylation to altered myosin kinetics in early cardiac disease2012 · 146 citations
  3. 3Virtual Electrophysiological Study of Atrial Fibrillation in Fibrotic Remodeling2015 · 125 citations
  4. 4Ensuring reliability of safety-critical clinical applications of computational cardiac models2013 · 50 citations
  5. 5Verification of computational models of cardiac electro‐physiology2013 · 53 citations