Two-dimensional echocardiography accurately determined left ventricular volume, showing no statistical difference compared to MRI for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, or ejection fraction.
Cross-Sectional (n=12)
12 healthy volunteers evaluated for left ventricular volume using a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic method compared to magnetic resonance imaging.
Two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method vs Magnetic resonance imaging
Left ventricular volume (end-diastolic and end-systolic) and ejection fraction
Left ventricular volume was determined in 12 healthy volunteers using a newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. The results were compared with those of magnetic resonance imaging, which served as the method of reference. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume was 123 +/- 12 ml, echocardiographically defined, and 121 +/- 12 ml calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. End-systolic volume was 41 +/- 7 ml on echocardiography and 37 +/- 6 ml on magnetic resonance imaging. Left ventricular ejection fraction was 67 +/- 4%, echocardiographically defined, and 70 +/- 5%, calculated with magnetic resonance imaging. There was no statistical difference for any of the measured parameters. Interstudy and inter-observer variability was minimal. In conclusion, in healthy volunteers left ventricular volume was accurately defined, using this newly developed two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method. During endocardial delineation a dynamic display is continuously available on a second window, allowing precise visual edge-detection. Moreover, corrections can be made easily and quickly. These two advantages enhance the accuracy of the method, even in cases of poor echogenicity.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Marie‐Christine Herregods
KU Leuven
G. De Paep
B. BUNENS
European Heart Journal
Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Herregods et al. (Mon,) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=12). Two-dimensional echocardiographic delineation method vs. Magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated on Left ventricular volume (end-diastolic and end-systolic) and ejection fraction. Two-dimensional echocardiography accurately determined left ventricular volume, showing no statistical difference compared to MRI for end-diastolic volume, end-systolic volume, or ejection fraction.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a2924fdd6d35f58f4252cb3 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a060630
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: