Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.
Cohort (n=37)
Absolute Event Rate: 75% vs 70%
BACKGROUND: Capillary whole-blood point-of-care prothrombin-INR (PT-INR) testing at home is an alternative to hospital-based monitoring for patients on lifelong warfarin. AIM: To retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of home point-of-care testing for children on long-term warfarin. METHOD: All patients who had been on point-of-care home monitoring for at least 6 months were included in the study. Their warfarin control was assessed while on home monitoring and compared to that achieved in a similar period before changing from hospital monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were studied for a mean of 1.0 year on clinic monitoring and 1.07 years on home monitoring. The clinic monitoring tests were within a therapeutic range for a median 70.0 (inter-quartile range 34.5) and the home monitoring were within range for median 75.0 (inter-quartile range 44.5). There were no major haemorrhagic or thrombotic complications in either group during the study period. Only 2.3% of all tests had an INR greater than 6.0 with no statistical differences seen between the clinic and home monitoring groups. CONCLUSION: Home point-of-care testing in children on lifelong warfarin is safe, effective and offers a number of advantages to the child and family. Ongoing training and support for the families is essential for this service.
Bradbury et al. (Sat,) conducted a cohort in Long-term warfarin therapy (n=37). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing vs. Hospital-based clinic monitoring was evaluated on Tests within therapeutic range (median). Home point-of-care PT-INR testing in children on long-term warfarin achieved a median time in therapeutic range of 75.0 compared to 70.0 with hospital monitoring, with no major complications.